Skip to main content

Count on Them: Sting Rays And Zebra Mbuna Can Do Maths

 

Recent studies have detected simple arithmetic abilities beyond mammal and bird brains, from salamanders to bees. A new study adds stingrays and cichlids to the small but growing list of animals that can do basic addition and subtraction.

Freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro) and zebra mbuna cichlids (Pseudotropheus zebra) both demonstrated this ability independent of just symbol memorization (transfer test)

"Individuals did not just learn to pick the highest or lowest number presented based on the respective color; instead, learning was specific to adding or subtracting 'one'," Bonn University zoologist Vera Schluessel and colleagues wrote in their paper.

Researchers presented Fishes with two gates displaying cards with different numbers of shapes. For example, they were trained that being shown a card with three blue squares meant the correct door with the reward behind it would be the one with four blue squares – they would have to add one. Or, if the card shapes were yellow, they would have to subtract one from the number of shapes to identify the correct door.

While not all individuals succeeded in learning the task (6 out of 8 cichlids and 3 out of 8 stingrays figured it out), those that did were remarkably adept at it. Stingrays chose the correct door 94 percent of the time for addition and were 89 percent accurate for subtraction. 

Both species found addition easier to learn than subtraction – the fishes required fewer training sessions to get the gist of addition and displayed higher performance levels.

Cichlids were faster at understanding their task, and more of them were successful; the team notes this may be because these fish had participated in other cognition experiments before, whereas the stingrays had not.

So these two completely different groups of fishes seem to have the ability to perform basic arithmetic despite not having any known ecological or behavioral need for it, Schluessel and team point out.

Both species are opportunistic feeders – not hunters – and show no requirement for counting in their mating behaviors, nor do they seem to prefer particular-sized social groups.

But this ability could be critical for something we just haven't looked for yet, such as distinguishing individuals by recognition of physical traits.

"A more interesting question is as to why animals such as fish… are still commonly referred to as 'primitive' or 'lower' vertebrates," the team posed. "It seems obvious that fish, their cognitive skills and their status to be considered as sentient animals urgently needs to be revisited, specifically in light of the detrimental anthropogenic threats fish face every day."

These fishes join honeybees on the small list of animals with confirmed capabilities of adding and subtracting outside of birds and mammals. There are likely more such clever creatures that we have yet to test.

"Fish possess many of the same cognitive abilities and to a similar extent as birds and mammals," the researchers concluded.

While we've come a long way from believing animals are thoughtless biological machines driven solely by instinct, we've still only just started working out just how intelligent our fellow living beings really are.

After all, our unprecedented cognitive abilities didn't merely arise miraculously – they developed within species that preceded us from seeds planted in our ancient evolutionary history, shared by many other animals on our planet.

This research was published in Scientific Reports. 


Similar Topics 

Spiders have No Ears, but they Can Hear well 

Biologists break yet another Myth About Sharks 

The U.S.A, The First Country in The World to Legal Rights to Individual Wild Animals

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many types of galaxies are in the universe?

  A world is a gathering of galactic items that are bound gravitationally. Consider planets and their normal satellites, comets and space rocks, stars and heavenly remainders, (for example, neutron stars or white diminutive people), the interstellar gasses between them, enormous residue, and inestimable beams, dull matter, and so forth. This large number of things are kept intact by the power of gravity that keeps them drawn to one another to frame a framework. This framework is known as a system. The universe is brimming with worlds. Researchers have assessed various quantities of worlds on account of information gathered by telescopes and interplanetary space tests, for example, NASA's Hubble Telescope and NASA's New Horizon shuttle. In 2020, they determined that there were around two trillion worlds in the perceptible universe. As you can envision, not these worlds have similar qualities, and they most certainly don't appear to be identical. Stargazers have perceived a f...
Read more

The Psychology of the Romantic Relationship that Improves You

It's not unexpected to need to improve as a form of yourself. Similar as the cravings to eat, drink and stay away from hurt, individuals additionally experience a central need to learn, develop and improve - what clinicians call self-extension. Think about your number one exercises. Things like perusing a book, investing energy in nature, chipping in with another association, taking a class, voyaging, attempting another café, practicing or watching a narrative all widen oneself. Those encounters add new information, abilities, points of view and characters. At the point when who you are as an individual grows, you upgrade your skill and capacities and increment your capacity to address new difficulties and achieve new objectives. Obviously, you can accomplish self-development all alone by attempting new and intriguing exercises (like playing Wordle), learning new things (like progressing through a language application) or chipping away at an ability (like rehearsing contemplation)....
Post a Comment
Read more

Ancient Genes for Symbiosis Hint at Mitochondria’s Origins

  Once, some time in the past, the main players in the excellent show of life, predation and demise were undetectably little and basic cells. Archaea and microorganisms jigged and spun through oceans and lakes, collected themselves into forts a couple of microns wide, and ate up movies of natural matter. Then some of them started to change, and in the long run the principal eukaryote — the primary living being to keep its qualities locked away in a core, to fix its inside with ramifying compartments, and, critically, to utilize mitochondria to make energy — showed up on the scene. We and the remainder of life noticeable to the unaided eye are the relatives of that cell, the last normal precursor, everything being equal. Researchers actually see generally minimal about what occurred during that change. One of the focal problems is the means by which and when our eukaryotic predecessor procured its mitochondria, the stalwart organelles that create the cell's energy. The mitochondrion...
Read more